On December 12, 2025 (Brasília), Brazil formally transferred the BRICS presidency to India, with India assuming chairmanship on January 1, 2026. This is not a routine rotation: it signals the next stage of Global South economic integration, where trade facilitation, climate finance, and digital governance move from declarations to implementation. This article translates and expands the full B2BRICS brief, covering the symbolism of the Amazon gavel, the shift from BRICS-5 to an expanded format, Brazil’s 2025 deliverables, India’s 2026 “Humanity-First” four-pillar agenda (Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation, Sustainability), the BRICS Pay debate, key risks (FX volatility, sanctions exposure, internal divergence), and actionable implications for exporters and B2B platforms.
The world is entering a period of historic reconfiguration of the international economic system. On December 12, 2025, Brazil formally handed the BRICS chairmanship to India—an event unfolding amid growing Western pressure and renewed efforts to build financial and trade alternatives to dollar-centric infrastructure. For B2B trade participants, exporters, and platforms operating across BRICS+, the transition opens major opportunities while introducing new operational and geopolitical risks.
At the 4th BRICS Sherpas Meeting in Brasília, Ambassador Mauricio Lyrio (Brazil) passed the gavel to Ambassador Sudhakar Dalela (India). The object itself is a message. It was made from recycled wood from the Amazon rainforest, reportedly including itaúba (Handroanthus crassifolius), pau rainha (pau d’arco), and jaqueira (Theobroma speciosum) from the community of Novo Airão in Amazonas state. Brazil’s framing: the gavel represents both resilience and the deep roots of cooperation uniting the group—linking the presidency transition to sustainability and environmental responsibility.
BRICS has expanded beyond its original five. The 2025 full members listed in the brief are: Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the UAE, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. The brief also lists BRICS+ partner countries (13+): Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Azerbaijan.
Aggregate weight cited: more than 3.5 billion people (about 43% of global population), roughly $27 trillion nominal GDP (about 29.8% of global), and roughly $53 trillion GDP (PPP) (about 58.6% of global). The message is clear: an expanded BRICS increases geopolitical reach, but also increases heterogeneity—and therefore coordination costs.
Brazil chaired BRICS under the motto: “Strengthening South–South Cooperation and Consensus-Building for a More Inclusive and Sustainable Global Governance.” The brief groups achievements into political outcomes, financial initiatives, and social/regional programs.
India’s vision is structured around four pillars and a ‘Humanity-First Approach.’ The brief highlights India’s intent to decentralize BRICS engagement—hosting meetings not only in elite capitals but across regions and cities—making BRICS more inclusive and economically grounded.
Definition (in BRICS context): the capacity of the global system to recover quickly from economic, geopolitical, and environmental shocks.
Definition: producing and distributing technological solutions accessible to all BRICS members—especially developing countries.
Definition: deeper integration of economies, culture, and governance subsystems.
Definition: long-term development without harming the environment and future generations.
The brief stresses that PPP weight reflects purchasing power, while nominal figures are depressed by weaker currencies (ruble, rupee, real), reducing apparent weight in USD terms.
The brief emphasizes that BRICS is no longer homogeneous. It lists friction points: India–China border tensions and Asian leadership rivalry; Saudi Arabia–Iran competition; Egypt–Ethiopia disputes; and differing positions on major conflicts—creating slower consensus-building.
A key practical issue for BRICS Pay and alternative currency systems is currency instability. The brief cites 2024–2025 moves (example figures): ruble -40% vs USD, rupee -8%, real -12%, rand -15%. The proposed mitigation mentioned: 40% gold + 60% currency basket, but volatility remains a challenge for real trade invoicing and settlement.
The brief states that the Trump administration has threatened sanctions against countries attempting to reduce the role of the US dollar, including potential tariffs (25%) and pressure on payment networks. It argues that such threats can slow adoption of BRICS Pay and discourage countries dependent on USD settlement.
More members and partners create more voices, slower procedures, and a risk of diluted influence. The brief illustrates this with a negotiation-intensive summit example, suggesting that consensus-building may become slower after expansion.
The brief notes different strategic postures: Brazil more cautious reformism; India ambitious; China strategic; Russia focused on de-globalization; others less clearly positioned—complicating unified action.
India’s plan for 100+ meetings in ~60 cities expands business touchpoints beyond Delhi. The brief suggests platforms can use this to run regional supplier forums and create localized pipelines for exporters and importers.
The brief frames BRICS Pay as an interoperability project connecting national rails such as UPI (India), SPFS (Russia), CIPS (China), and Pix (Brazil). For B2B platforms, the promise is lower fees (from ~2–3% down to ~0.1–0.5% as cited) and faster settlement—if compliance and liquidity issues are handled.
DPI is positioned as the foundation for trust and scale: unified identity, digital payments, and data exchange. The brief suggests using Aadhaar + UPI patterns for faster verification of Indian counterparties, with similar systems potentially emerging across BRICS.
Climate finance initiatives (including the Tropical Forest Forever Fund) are framed as creating new B2B markets: sustainable project finance, carbon credits, green technology exports, and sustainable supply chains. Platforms can launch dedicated “Green Trade” segments to connect suppliers and buyers.
The brief points to corridor logic: BIMSTEC (South Asia), an East African corridor, and Mercosur–BRICS linkages. For marketplaces, the playbook is corridor-specific positioning, localized support, and category-focused sourcing.
The December 12, 2025 handover is presented not as routine administration but as a marker of deeper global economic rebalancing. The Amazon gavel symbolizes that this rebalancing should be anchored in sustainability, fairness, and inclusion. India’s 2026 presidency will be a decisive period for whether the Global South can build practical alternatives in payments, trade facilitation, and institutional reform. For B2B trade actors, the message is dual: large new opportunities—paired with the need to adapt to new payment rails, corridors, and geopolitical realities.
No posts found
Write a review